Visualisasi Mekanisme Flooding Aliran Counter-Current Air-Udara pada Simulator Hotleg Dengan L/D=50

  • Suprianta Setiawan Putra Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Apip Badarudin
  • De endarlianto
  • Indar to
  • Sinung Tirtha
  • Venti Yoanita
  • Marcellinus Sindhu

Abstract

In this study, the experiments used a hotleg simulator which consists of three parts: a horizontal pipe, bend and riser. Geometry sizes of pipes in a scale of 1/30 of the actual hotleg geometry size in the PWR, with ratio L/D = 50. Hotleg simulator has an inside diameter = 25.4 mm, the horizontal pipe length L = 1270 mm, and riser pipe length 20 mm with an angle of 50o. The visual data was collected by using a high speed camera to observe the mechanism of flooding that occurred in hotleg simulator. Flooding mechanism was identified by analyzing the phenomena that occur at the time of the flooding. From the observation of a high speed camera, it was found that the initiation of flooding coincided with the formation of liquid slug. At low superficial velocity of water, the onset of slugging occurs near a bend. While at higher superficial velocity of water, the onset of slugging occurs away from the bend.  Comparison of horizontal pipe length to the diameter of pipes (L/D) provide a significant effect on the flooding phenomenon.

Keywords: pressurized water reactor, onset of flooding, onset of slugging, hydraulic jump, hotleg.

References

Badarudin, A., Indarto, Deendarlianto, Hermawan, Saka, A., M. Fikri Haykal Syarif, M.F.H, Wicaksono, A., 2014, Observasi karakteristik CCFL pada pipa kompleks, ReTII IX, hal 371-375.

Deendarlianto, Vallée, C., Lucas, D., Beyer, M., Pietruske, H., Carl, H., 2008, Experimental Study on the Air/water Counter-current Flow Limitation in a Model of the Hot Leg of a Pressurized Water Reactor. Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 238 (12), 3389-3402.

Deendarlianto, Höhne, T., Lucas, D., Vierow, K., 2012. Gas–liquid countercurrent two-phase flow in a PWR hot leg: A comprehensive research review, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Elsevier, Vol. 234, 214-233.

Issa, S., Macian, R., 2011. A review of CCFL phenomenon, Annals of Nuclear Energy, Elsevier, Vol. 38, pp. 1795-1819.

Issa, S., Macian, R., 2014. Experimental investigation of countercurrent flow limitation (CCFL) in large-diameter hot-leg geometry : A detailed description of CCFL mechanism, flow pattern and high quality HSC imaging of the interfacial structure in a 1/3.9 scale of PWR geometry, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Elsevier, Vol. 280, pp. 550-563.

Kang, S.K., Chu, I.C., No, H.C., Chun, M.H., 1999, Air–water countercurrent flow limitation in a horizontal pipe connected to an inclined riser. Journal of the Korean Nuclear Society, Vol. 31 (6), 548–560.

Seidel, T., Vallée, C., Lucas, D., Beyer, M., Deendarlianto, 2010, Two-Phase Flow Experiments in a Model of the Hot Leg of a Pressurised Water Reactor, Wissenschaftlich-Technische Berichte/ Forschungszentrum Dresden- Rossendorf; FZD-531.

Wongwises, S., 1996, Two-phase countercurrent flow in a model of a pressurized water reactor hot leg, Nuclear Engineering and Design Vol. 166, pp. 121-133

Published
2017-03-07
How to Cite
Putra, S. S., Badarudin, A., endarlianto, D., to, I., Tirtha, S., Yoanita, V. and Sindhu, M. (2017) “Visualisasi Mekanisme Flooding Aliran Counter-Current Air-Udara pada Simulator Hotleg Dengan L/D=50”, ReTII, 00. Available at: //journal.itny.ac.id/index.php/ReTII/article/view/467 (Accessed: 4December2024).