PERENCANAAN PENGEMBANGAN ASET FASILITAS HUTAN KOTA PATRIOT BINA BANGSA BEKASI BERDASARKAN PLACEMAKING
Abstract
Bekasi City Forest is one of the Green Open Space (RTH) with an area of 42,673 m2. In the Patriot Bina Bangsa Bekasi City Forest, the available facility assets are of poor quality. The development of facility assets is carried out based on the concept of Placemaking based on the criteria of Access and Linkages, Comfort and Image, Uses and Activities, and Sociability. The purpose of this project is to produce a plan for the development of facility assets and the amount of cost estimates. The analysis method uses descriptive analysis with qualitative and quantitative approaches. Data collection techniques include observation and interviews. This project resulted in a design based on Access and Linkages criteria covering a pedestrian path with an area of 1040 m2 and a parking area with an area of 587.08 m2. Comfort and Image plan by providing 49.5 m2 prayer room, 71.58 m2 toilet, 26 units of park benches, 26 units of trash cans, 52 units of garden lights, 4 m2 guard post and 4 units of CCTV. Criteria Uses and Activities is planned children's playroom with 3 units of seesaw facilities, 2 units of swings, and 1 set of children's playground. The sports room is planned with 500 m2 jogging track facilities, outdoor fitness, and 420 m2 basketball court. And a recreation room is planned paintball facility measuring 50 x 20 m. Meanwhile, as a criterion for Sociability, an amphitheater facility with an area of 225 m2 is planned. The estimated cost of demolition, construction, and procurement costs if realized in 2023 is IDR 5,538,640,885.
Keywords: Urban Forest Assets, RTH Quality, Placemaking, Planning, Development
Downloads
References
E. AtmiÅŸ,“Development of urban forest governance in Turkey,â€In Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, vol. 19, pp. 158–166, 2016.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.018
A. BeleandN.Wasade, “Perception, use and experience of urban open spaces –case studies of neighbourhood public parks in Nagpur. International Journal of Science and Research, vol.7,no.9, 712–717, 2018.https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20191317
J. D. Campbell, A. K. S. Jardine, andJ. McGlynn, ASSET MANAGEMENT Life-Cycle Decisions, 2016.
E. Darmawan, “Peranan ruang publik dalam perancangan kota (urban design)â€. Peranan Ruang Publik Dalam Perancangan Kota (Urban Design), vol. 1,pp.57, 2014.
S. Fabio, S. Borelli, M. Conigliaro, andY. Chen, “Guidelines on urban and peri-urban forestry,â€In Fao, 2016.
Firmansyah, A. R. Soeriaatmadja, andR. Wulanningsih, “A set of sustainable urban landscape indicators and parameters to evaluate urban green open space in Bandung City,â€IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,vol. 179,no. 1.2018.https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/179/1/012016
N. A. J. Hastings,“Physical asset management: With an introduction to ISO55000,â€In Physical Asset Management,2015.
U. Hidayat, S. Ikhsan,I.Risnaningsih,and T. A.Pratomo, “Implementasi manajemen aset tetap pada koperasi fungsional dalam optimalisasi pemanfaatan aset tetap,â€Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Disiplin Indonesia, vol. 1, no. 2,pp.247–262, 2021.https://katadata.co.id/berita/2020/01/06/baru-83-peserta-bpjs-kesehatan-per-akhir-2019-
F. N. Lantang,B. F.Soempie, and G. Y.Malingkas, “Perencanaan biaya dengan menggunakan perhitungan biaya nyata pada proyek perumahan (studi kasus perumahan Green Hill Residence),â€Jurnal Sipil Statik, vol. 2, no. 2,pp.73–80, 2014.
C. Liu, S.-K. Pun,and C.Langston, “Present status of building demolition,â€A preliminary study on building demolition engineering and management, vol. 4,no.2,pp.201–207, 2021.http://www.wiete.com.au/journals/WTE&TE/Pages/Vol.4, No.2 (2005)/10-Liu34.pdf
N. A. Malek, S. Z. Mohammad, and A.Nashar, “Determinant factor for quality green open space assessment in Malaysia,â€2018.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.33579/krvtk.v8i2.4085KURVATEK Vol. 8, No. 2, November2023: 173–180180
PPS andMetropolitan Planning Council,A guide to neighborhood placemaking in Chicago. Project for public spaces, 5. http://www.placemakingchicago.com/cmsfiles/placemaking_guide.pdf
A. Prawoto, “Teori dan praktek penilaian properti : Buku pegangan bagi peminat mendalami atau bermaksud menjadi penilai propertiâ€p. 2, 2014.
J. Rutherford, “Classification framework for public open space,â€Issue November, pp. 1–15, 2012.
S. A. Salih andS. Ismail, “Criteria for public open space enhancement to achieve social interaction: a review paper,â€IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 291, no.1, 2018.https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/291/1/012001
Samsudi, “Ruang terbuka hijau kebutuhan tata ruang perkotaan Kota Surakarta,â€Journal of Rural and Development, Vol. 1No.1,pp.11–19.2015.
S. Schetke, S. Qureshi, S. Lautenbach, and Kabisch, “What determines the use of urban green spaces in highly urbanized areas? -Examples from two fast growing Asian cities,â€In Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, Vol. 16, pp. 150–159. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.009
Subarudi, Samsoedin, I., Sylviani, Syahadat, E., Ariawan, K., Suryandari, E. Y., andPanjaitan, J. H., “Pengembangan Hutan Kota/Lanskap Perkotaan,†2015.
Copyright (c) 2023 Melati Realita -
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows:
• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
