Tingkat Aksesibilitas Transportasi Publik di Kota Yogyakarta

  • A. Yunastiawan Eka Pramana Jurusan Teknik Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, STTNAS Yogyakarta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33579/rkr.v1i1.775

Abstract

Aksesibilitas merupakan faktor utama di dalam pertumbuhan fisik suatu kota. Kawasan-kawasan dengan tingkat aksesibilitas yang tinggi merupakan kawasan dengan tingkat permintaan yang tinggi. Kawasan-kawasan tersebut kemudian akan dialokasikan sesuai dengan prinsip the highest and best use. Hal ini menyebabkan identifikasi terhadap tingkat aksesibilitas di area perkotaan menjadi suatu hal yang penting. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengidentifikasi tingkat aksesibilitas transportasi publik di Kota Yogyakarta. Pendekatan location based accessibility dipergunakan untuk mengidentifikasi kondisi aksesibilitas transportasi publik di Kota Yogyakarta. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kawasan-kawasan yang didominasi oleh aktivitas perdagangan dan jasa merupakan kawasan dengan tingkat aksesibilitas transportasi publik yang tinggi. Sementara kawasan dengan fungsi dominan permukiman justru merupakan kawasan dengan tingkat aksesibilitas transportasi publik yang rendah.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Mamun, M., & Lownes, N. (2011). A Composite Index of Public Transit Accessibility. Journal of Public Transportation, 14(2), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.14.2.4

Albacete, X., Olaru, D., Paül, V., & Biermann, S. (2017). Measuring the Accessibility of Public Transport: A Critical Comparison Between Methods in Helsinki. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 10(2), 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-015-9177-8

Alonso, W. (1964). Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674730854

Bettencourt, L. M. A. (2013). The Kind of Problem a City Is.

Boisjoly, G., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2017). The insider: A planners’ perspective on accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 64(July), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.006

Daniels, R., & Mulley, C. (2013). Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 6(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v6i2.308

Debrezion, G., Pels, E., & Rietveld, P. (2007). The impact of railway stations on residential and commercial property value: A meta-analysis. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 35(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-007-9032-z

Dirgahayani, P., & Nakamura, F. (2012). Fostering partnerships towards sustainable urban mobility from the national to local level: Matsuyama, Japan and Yogyakarta, Indonesia. IATSS Research, 36(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2012.01.001

Efthymiou, D., & Antoniou, C. (2013). How do transport infrastructure and policies affect house prices and rents? Evidence from Athens, Greece. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 52, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.04.002

Evans, A. W. (2004). Land Values, Rents and Demand. In Economics, Real Estate, and the Supply of Land (pp. 11–29). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Ibeas, ángel, Cordera, R., Dell’Olio, L., Coppola, P., & Dominguez, A. (2012). Modelling transport and real-estate values interactions in urban systems. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.012

Jayantha, W. M., Lam, T. I., & Chong, M. L. (2015). The impact of anticipated transport improvement on property prices: A case study in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 49(2015), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.023

Mulley, C., & Tsai, C. H. (Patrick). (2016). When and how much does new transport infrastructure add to property values? Evidence from the bus rapid transit system in Sydney, Australia. Transport Policy, 51, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.011

Prihatin, R. B. (2015). Alih Fungsi Lahan di Perkotaan (Studi Kasus di Kota Bandung dan Yogyakarta). Jurnal Aspirasi, Vol. 6(No. 2), 105–118.

Rachmawati, R., Rijanta, R., & Subanu, L. P. (2004). Peranan Kampus Sebagai emicu Urbanisasi Spasial di Pinggiran Kota Yogyakarta. Majalah Geografi Indonesia.

Raharjo, N. R. (2011). Pengaruh Kualitas Jasa Terhadap Citra Trans Jogja. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.

Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2015). The nature of cities: The scope and limits of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12134

Smith, J. J., & Gihring, T. A. (2006). Financing transit systems through value capture. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65(3), 751–786. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2006.00474.x

Yigitcanlar, T., Sipe, N., Evans, R., & Pitot, M. (2007). A GISâ€based land use and public transport accessibility indexing model. Australian Planner, 44(3), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2007.9982586

Published
2018-06-30
Issue
Vol 1 No 1 (2018): Reka Ruang
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work