Spasialisasi Kerentanan Sosial Ekonomi Terhadap Perkembangan Wilayah Pesisir Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta

yusliana

yusliana Institut Teknologi Nasioanl Yogyakarta

Abstract

One of the benchmarks in regional development is how the level of vulnerability of a region is socially and economically. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the level of socio-economic vulnerability in the coastal area of DIY, namely knowing the distribution and level of economic vulnerability in the coastal area of DIY which was then spatialized in the form of a map. The approach taken in this research is descriptive quantitative with analytical tools using GIS. The assessment method is also used as a first step in parameter assessment to determine the level of vulnerability. The results of the analysis show that the level of socio-economic vulnerability in the coastal area of Yogyakarta is divided into 3 categories, namely high, medium, with a classification of four regional developments. Developed areas are those that are economically classified as low vulnerability and socially included in vulnerability are Tanjungsari District, Sanden District, Temon District, Kretek District, Wates District and Galur District, Panjatan District. Developing areas are areas with high economic vulnerability and low social vulnerability. Tepus and Panggang sub-districts. Furthermore, underdeveloped areas are areas with high economic vulnerability and high social vulnerability, namely in the Girisubo District. The developed but depressed areas are areas with low economic vulnerability and high social vulnerability, namely Purwosari District, Saptori District and Srandakan District

References

1. Nakamura D. Spatial Policy for a Competitive Regional System: Economic and Social Infrastructure Elements. J Urban Manag. 2013;2(1):103–12.
2. Lakshmi SR, Shaji TL. Transformation of Coastal Settlements Due to Tourism. Procedia Technol. 2016;24:1668–80.
3. Rostika R, Purba NP, Lutfi M, Kelvin J, Silalahi I. The Managing Plan for Abrasion in Coastal Area of Garut Regency. Procedia Environ Sci. 2016;33:512–9.
4. Dawson DA, Hunt A, Shaw J, Gehrels WR. The Economic Value of Climate Information in Adaptation Decisions: Learning in the Sea-level Rise and Coastal Infrastructure Context. Ecol Econ. 2018;150(August 2017):1–10.
5. Dariah AR, Salleh MS, Saniff SBM, Ernawati. Comparative study of sustainable development planning in Southeast Asia countries. Int J Sustain Dev Plan. 2020;15(4):469–76.
6. Rempis N, Alexandrakis G, Tsilimigkas G, Kampanis N. Coastal use synergies and con fl icts evaluation in the framework of spatial , development and sectoral policies. Ocean Coast Manag. 2018;(October 2017):0–1.
7. Yusliana, Devi MK. Interaksi wilayah pusat pertumbuhan melalui pendekatan skalogram dan gravitasi di wilayah pesisir daerah istimewa yogyakarta. Geodika J Kaji Ilmu dan Pendidik Geogr. 2020;4:148–59.
8. Yusliana Y, Fitria LM, Antus EP, Waskita Hutama IA. Distribution Patterns and Settlement Density Using Nearest Neighbor Analysis and Kernel Density Analysis in Diy Coastal Areas. J Geogr. 2022;14(2):202.
9. Luo E, Kuffer M, Wang J. Urban poverty maps - From characterising deprivation using geo-spatial data to capturing deprivation from space. Sustain Cities Soc [Internet]. 2022;84(April):104033. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104033
10. Weldearegay SK, Tefera MM, Feleke ST. Impact of urban expansion to peri-urban smallholder farmers’ poverty in Tigray, North Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2021;7(Juni):1–11.
11. Habibi M, Buchori DI. MODEL SPASIAL KERENTANAN SOSIAL EKONOMI DAN KELEMBAGAAN TERHADAP BENCANA GUNUNG MERAPI (“Spatial Model of Social Economic and Institutional Vulnerability Of Merapi Disaster”). J Tek PWK [Internet]. 2013;2(1):2013. Available from: http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk
12. Hapsoro AW, Buchori I. Kajian Kerentanan Sosial Dan Ekonomi Terhadap Bencana Banjir (Studi Kasus: Wilayah Pesisir Kota Pekalongan). Tek PWK (Perencanaan Wil Kota). 2015;4(4):542–53.
13. Chang Y, Chu K wai, Chuang LZH. Sustainable coastal zone planning based on historical coastline changes: A model from case study in Tainan, Taiwan. Landsc Urban Plan. 2018;174(May 2017):24–32.
14. Bishop-Taylor R, Nanson R, Sagar S, Lymburner L. Mapping Australia’s dynamic coastline at mean sea level using three decades of Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 2021;267(March):112734.
15. Darmawan, K., Suprayogi A. Analisis Tingkat Kerawanan Banjir Di Kabupaten Sampang Menggunakan Metode Overlay Dengan Scoring Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis. J Geod Undip [Internet]. 2017;6(1):31–40. Available from: https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/geodesi/article/view/15024