Landmark Sebagai Identitas Dan Daya Tarik Kota

Landmark as the Identity and Attraction of the City

Authors

  • Edhi Prasetya Universitas Pancasila
  • Agus S. Sadana
  • Ashri Prawesthi
  • Diptya Anggita
  • Swambodo M. Adi

Keywords:

landmark, city identity, city image, community service, Tugu Yogyakarta

Abstract

ABSTRACT

As part of the implementation of the Tri Dharma of Higher Education, community service activities are an essential responsibility of lecturers to disseminate research outcomes to the broader public. One such activity is a public outreach program focusing on the role of landmarks as a city’s identity and attraction. Landmarks play a significant role in shaping urban visual order, enhancing spatial orientation, and fostering emotional attachment between people and their environment. Using the case study of Tugu Yogyakarta, also known as Tugu Pal Putih, this program aims to raise public awareness of the importance of landmarks as cultural symbols and urban identity elements that contribute to city image and tourism appeal. The study indicates that although Tugu Yogyakarta is widely recognized as a tourism icon, many people are still unaware of its symbolic meaning and its role in shaping the city’s image. Therefore, this outreach program is expected to increase public understanding of the cultural significance of landmarks while supporting government efforts in cultural preservation and strengthening urban character.

Keywords: landmark, city identity, city image, community service, Tugu Yogyakarta

References

K. Lynch, The Image of The City. The M.I.T. Press, 1960.

S. Ziaei, “Urban Landmarks and Their Relationships with Place Attachment,” University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/51735/1/FRSB 2014 8RR.pdf

S. Can, “The City Image and Its Elements by Kevin Lynch,” All About My Architectural Education, 2019. https://semanurcan.wordpress.com/2019/10/27/the- city-image-and-its-elements-by-kevin-lynch/ (accessed May 21, 2024).

T. A. Sigit, “Sumbu Filosofi Yogyakarta Resmi Ditetapkan UNESCO Sebagai Warisan Dunia.” Kanwil DJPb Prov. D.I.Y., 2024. [Online]. Available: https://djpb.kemenkeu.go.id/kanwil/diy/id/data-publikasi/artikel/3699-sumbu-filosofi- yogyakarta-resmi-ditetapkan-unesco-sebagai-warisan-dunia.html

M. I. Amar and R. E. A. Sartika, “New York Times Sebut Yogyakarta sebagai ‘Center of the Universe’, Kok Bisa?,” kompas.com, Jakarta, Jan. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2025/01/27/160000165/new-york- times-sebut-yogyakarta-sebagai-center-of-the-universe-kok-bisa?page=all

S. Mowbray, “Never Heard of Yogyakarta? It Might Be the Center of the Universe,” The New York Times, New York, p. 20, Jan. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/20/travel/yogyakarta-indonesia.html

Kratonjogja.id, “Sumbu Filosofi Yogyakarta, Tugu Golong Gilig Setelah Gempa 1867.” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://kratonjogja.id/tata-rakiting/11-tugu-golong- gilig-simbol-persatuan-rajadan-rakyat/

Kratonjogja.id, “Sumbu Filosofi Yogyakarta, Pengejawantahan Asal dan Tujuan Hidup,” 2022. https://www.kratonjogja.id/tata-rakiting/21-sumbu-filosofi-yogyakarta- pengejawantahan-asal-dan-tujuan-hidup/

A. S. Sadana and A. I. Wibisono, “Introducing Landmarks: The Tugu Yogyakarta’s Popularity in Literature Review and Online Media.,” J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Stud., vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 45–59, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2024.6.11.4.

A. S. Sadana, L. E. Prasetya, A. P. Dharmaraty, A. I. Wibisono, and S. M. Adi, “The Yogyakarta’s Special Fascination: Iconic Landmarks, Memories, Hopes, and Challenges,” Res. Find. that are Curr. being Process. as a J. Artic., 2025.

A. S. Sadana, L. E. Prasetya, and A. P. Dharmaraty, “Pemahaman Masyarakat Terhadap Transformasi Nilai-nilai Filosofis Dalam Tata Ruang Kota Yogyakarta,” in Prosiding Semrestek 2023, 2024, pp. 283–291. [Online]. Available: https://teknik.univpancasila.ac.id/semrestek/prosiding/index.php/12345/article/view/ 529

A. S. Sadana, “The Urban Elements’ Visual Attractiveness of Tugu Pal Putih as Yogyakarta City Tourist Spot,” Int. J. Glocal Tour., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 223–232, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.58982/injogt.v2i4.123.

A. S. Sadana, L. E. Prasetya, S. M. Adi, and A. P. Dharmaraty, “The Cyclist’s Behavior in Yogyakarta’s City Landmark,” Int. J. Res. Rev., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 423– 431, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20240550.

J. E. Chukwuere, D. Adom, and P. C. Chukwuere, A-Z of Social Media Research Methods. Mahikeng: Jozac Publishers, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.57040/JP.4.

R. Dolan, J. Conduit, C. Frethey-Bentham, J. Fahy, and S. Goodman, “Social media engagement behavior,” Eur. J. Mark., vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 2213–2243, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1108/EJM-03-2017-0182.

E. A. M. Supanggih, C. Ferdyani, and A. A. D. A, “Nilai Religiositas dalam Tembang ‘Tak Lela-Lela Ledhung,’” Satwika Kaji. Ilmu Budaya dan Perubahan Sos., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 20–28, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/satwika.v1i2.7015.

N. A. Hawa, B. Harto, and P. Pramuditha, “Efektifitas Komunikasi Pemasaran Bisnis UMKM Melalui Fitur Reels Instagram,” Komversal J. Komun. Univers., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 40–51, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.38204/komversal.v5i1.1204.

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

Prasetya, E., S. Sadana, A., Prawesthi, A., Anggita, D. and M. Adi, S. (2025) “Landmark Sebagai Identitas Dan Daya Tarik Kota: Landmark as the Identity and Attraction of the City ”, ReTII, pp. 47–56. Available at: https://journal.itny.ac.id/index.php/ReTII/article/view/6247 (Accessed: 4June2026).