JARAK LAYANAN, KAPASITAS KELEMBAGAAN DAN KERAGAMAN CAPAIAN PEMBANGUNAN DI INDONESIA
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Artikel ini membahas peran kebijakan pemerintah didalam melaksanakan otonomi daerah untuk mengurangi ketertinggalan dan ketimpangan antar wilayah. Jika pendekatan otonomi daerah dipandang mampu mengurangi jarak dan cakupan layanan pemerintah kepada masyarakat, seyogyanya seluruh daerah di Indonesia akan berkembang serta tidak lagi ada ketimpangan antar wilayah. Fokus kajian diarahkan kepada bagaimana kebijakan menghasilkan capaian hasil pembangunan daerah yang berbeda-beda satu dengan lainnya. Dua kelompok amatan yang berisikan wilayah berstatus daerah tertinggal dan non-tertinggal dikembangkan untuk melihat variasi dan faktor penyebabnya. Hasil kajian mengindikasikan kebijakan yang selama ini ditempuh oleh pemerintah belum mampu menghilangkan derajat ketertinggalan dan ketimpangan antar wilayah di Indonesia.
Kata kunci: otonomi daerah, ketimpangan antar wilayah, daerah tertinggal
ABTRACT
This article evaluates the role of government policy in addressing regional disparity through the lens of local autonomy. If local autonomy is perceived as capable in reducing span of control and the coverage area of government service provision to the local community, the application of such a policy would lead to the reduction of regional disparity. Two groups with different development achievement were created and evaluated in order to identify why there were variations between the two and what factors contribute to such variations. The result indicates the existing government policy was incapable in alleviating lagging regions and regional disparity.
Keywords: local autonomy, regional disparity, lagging regions
Downloads
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Bakija, J., Kenworthy, L., Lindert, P. & Madrick, J. 2016. How Big Should Our Government Be? University of California Press: Oakland, CA.
Bird, R.M. & Vaillancourt, F. 2000 (1998). Desentralisasi Fiskal di Negara-Negara Berkembang: Tinjauan umum. Dalam Bird, R.M. & Vaillancourt, F. (eds) 2000 (1998). Desentralisasi Fiskal di Negara-Negara Berkembang. Gramedia Pustaka Utama: Jakarta, Indonesia. pp.1-67.
Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and power in an American city. Yale University Press.
Emerson, K. & Nabatchi, T. 2015. Collaborative Governance Regimes. Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC.
Feiock, Richard C. 2004. Introduction: Regionalism and Institutional Collective Action. In Feiock, Richard C. (ed.). 2004. Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation. Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC.
Feiock, Richard C. 2009. Metropolitan Governance and Institutional Collective Action. Urban Affairs Review 44 (3): 356-377.
Flanagan, Richard M. 2004. Opportunities and Constraints on Mayoral Behavior: A historical institutional approach. Journal of Urban Affairs 26 (1): 43-65.
Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press: New York, N.Y.
Hunter, Floyd. 1953. Community Power Structure: A study of decision-makers. University of North Carolina Press: Chapel Hill, N.C.
Logan, J.R. & Molotch, H. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The political economy of place. University of California Press.
Molotch, Harvey. 1976. The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology 82 (2): 309-322.
Olberding, Julie. 2002a. Does Regionalism Beget Regionalism? The relationship between norms and regional partnerships for economic development. Public Administration Review 62: 480-91.
Olberding, Julie. 2002b. Diving into the “Third Waves” of Regional Governance Strategies: A study of regional partnerships for economic development in U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Economic Development Quarterly 16: 251-72.
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
Ostrom, Vincent. 1989. Some Developments in the Study of Market Choice, Public Choice, and Institutional Choice. In Rabin, E., Hildreth, W.B. & Miller, G.J. (eds). 1989. Handbook of Public Administration. Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY. pp. 861-882.
Parks, R.B. & Oakerson, R.J. 1989. Metropolitan Organization and Governance: A local public economy approach. Urban Affairs Review 25 (1): 18-29.
Peterson, Paul E. 1981. City Limits. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.
Polsby, Nelson W. 1960. How to Study Community Power: The Pluralist Alternative. The Journal of Politics 22 (3): 474-484
Putnam, R.D. 1977. Elite Transformation in Advance Industrial Societies: An empirical assessment of the theory of technocracy. Comparative Political Studies 10 (3): 383–411
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press: Oakland, CA.
Robeyns, Ingrid. 2005. The Capability Approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development 6 (1): 93–117
Savitch, H.V. & Kantor, Paul. 2005. How to Study Comparative Urban Development: A research note. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (1): 135-51.
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. Anchor Books: New York, NY.
Smoke, P. & Lewis, B.D. 1996. Fiscal Decentralization in Indonesia: A new approach to an old idea. World Development 24 (8): 1281-1299.
Stone, Clarence N. 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. University Press of Kansas: Lawrence, KS
Tiebout, Charles M. 1956. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditure. The Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416-424.
Tullock, Gordon. 1965. The Politics of Bureaucracy. Public Affairs Press: Washington, DC.
Yin, Robert K. 2014. Case Study Research Design and Methods, 5th edition. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
