PENILAIAN KUALITAS RUANG TERBUKA PUBLIK UNTUK LIVABILITAS MASYARAKAT DISEKITARNYA MELALUI PERSEPSI PENGGUNA : STUDI KASUS KOTA MAGELANG, INDONESIA
Abstract
Taman merupakan salah satu bentuk ruang terbuka publik yang memiliki peran penting di daerah perkotaan dalam rangka penyediaan layanan ekologis untuk penduduk. Taman adalah fasilitas penting yang mendorong kelayakan hidup perkotaan. Liveability berarti kualitas hidup yang dialami oleh penduduk suatu lingkungan melalui berbagai layanan / fasilitas yang ditawarkan oleh kota dan kondisi yang membuat mereka nyaman tinggal di sana. Masyarakat cenderung berkunjung ketaman private, taman berbayar, dan tempat hiburan komersil lainnya dan kurang memperhatikan taman publik yang ada disekitarnya untuk dapat dimanfaatkan secara optimal untuk kegiatan fisik dan sosial. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi faktor utama yang mempengaruhi persepsi masyarakat tentang taman di Kota Magelang. Hal ini dimaksudkan untuk mengetahui kualitas taman dalam hal liveability. Untuk mendapatkan informasi yang berkaitan dengan persepsi penduduk ditaman, maka dilakukan observasi, wawancara dengan para pemangku kepentingan dan kuesioner dengan sampel 158 rumah tangga disekitar 3 taman sebagai studi kasus dengan radius 0 – 150 m dari taman. Berdasarkan bentuk / tipologi, 2 taman adalah taman berbentuk kantong, dan satu taman adalah taman memanjang. Berdasarkan lokasi 2 taman diletakkan di dekat jalan utama dan satu taman yang terletak di tengah kawasan pemukiman. Analisis deskriptive digunakan untuk menganalisis faktor – faktor yang mendukung dan menghambat masyarakat untuk berkunjung ketaman. Berdasarkan studi kasus ini, bentuk dan lokasi yang berbeda memiliki pengaruh terhadap minat responden sebagaimana Usia, Gender, Pendidikan, dan Pekerjaan Orang Dewasa yang berbeda juga mempengaruhi preferensi responden.
Kata Kunci : ruang terbuka publik; kualitas taman; persepsi pengguna taman; kelayakan hidup komunitas.
Downloads
References
Anguluri, Ramesh, and Priya Narayanan. 2017. “Role of Green Space in Urban Planning: Outlook towards Smart Cities.†Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 25 (July): 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.04.007.
Badland, Hannah, Carolyn Whitzman, Melanie Lowe, Melanie Davern, Lu Aye, Iain Butterworth, Dominique Hes, and Billie Giles-Corti. 2014. “Urban Liveability: Emerging Lessons from Australia for Exploring the Potential for Indicators to Measure the Social Determinants of Health.†Social Science & Medicine 111 (June): 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.003.
Cohen, D. et al. 2007. “Contribution of Public Parks to Physical Activity.†American Journal of Public Health 97: 509–14.
Cohen, Deborah A., J. Scott Ashwood, Molly M. Scott, Adrian Overton, Kelly R. Evenson, Lisa K. Staten, Dwayne Porter, Thomas L. McKenzie, and Diane Catellier. 2006. “Public Parks and Physical Activity among Adolescent Girls.†Pediatrics 118 (5): e1381-1389. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1226.
Daniels, Benjamin, Barbara S. Zaunbrecher, Bastian Paas, Richard Ottermanns, Martina Ziefle, and Martina Roß-Nickoll. 2018. “Assessment of Urban Green Space Structures and Their Quality from a Multidimensional Perspective.†Science of The Total Environment 615 (February): 1364–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.167.
Giles-Corti, Billie, Melissa H. Broomhall, Matthew Knuiman, Catherine Collins, Kate Douglas, Kevin Ng, Andrea Lange, and Robert J. Donovan. 2005. “Increasing Walking: How Important Is Distance to, Attractiveness, and Size of Public Open Space?†American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Active Living Research, 28 (2, Supplement 2): 169–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018.
Hami, Ahmad, Bin Maulan Suhardi, Mariapan Manohar, and Muhammad Malekizadeh,. 2014. “The Relationship between Landscape Planting Patterns and Perceived Safety in Urban Parks in Tabriz, Iran.†African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 8 (2): 107–13. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2013.1486.
Hashim, Nor Hanisah Mohd, Sharifah Khalizah Syed Othman Thani, Mas Aiyu Jamaludin, and Norkatini Mohd Yatim. 2016. “A Perceptual Study on the Influence of Vegetation Design Towards Women’s Safety in Public Park.†Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 234 (October): 280–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.244.
Jansson, Märit, Hanna Fors, Therese Lindgren, and Björn Wiström. 2013. “Perceived Personal Safety in Relation to Urban Woodland Vegetation – A Review.†Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 12 (2): 127–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.01.005.
Jim, C. Y., and Xizhang Shan. 2013. “Socioeconomic Effect on Perception of Urban Green Spaces in Guangzhou, China.†Cities 31 (April): 123–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.017.
Koohsari, Mohammad Javad, Suzanne Mavoa, Karen Villanueva, Takemi Sugiyama, Hannah Badland, Andrew T. Kaczynski, Neville Owen, and Billie Giles-Corti. 2015. “Public Open Space, Physical Activity, Urban Design and Public Health: Concepts, Methods and Research Agenda.†Health & Place 33 (May): 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.009.
Lowe, M et al. 2013. “Liveable, Health, Sustainable : What Are the Key Indicators for Melbourne Neighbourhoods?†place, health and liveability research program, University of Melbourne.
Malek, Nurhayati Abdul, Manohar Mariapan, and Mustafa Kamal Mohd Shariff. 2012. “The Making of a Quality Neighbourhood Park: A Path Model Approach.†Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Proceedings of the 1st National Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies, 1nCEBS, FAPS, UiTM, Shah Alam, Malaysia, 14–15 November, 2009, 49 (January): 202–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.07.019.
Sakip, Siti Rasidah Md, Norizan Mt Akhir, and Siti Syamimi Omar. 2015. “Determinant Factors of Successful Public Parks in Malaysia.†Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, AcE-Bs 2014 Seoul (Asian Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies),Chung-Ang University, Seoul, S. Korea, 25-27 August 2014, 170 (January): 422–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.003.
Sanesi, Giovanni, and Francesco Chiarello. 2006. “Residents and Urban Green Spaces: The Case of Bari.†Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 4 (3): 125–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2005.12.001.
Shirvani, Hamid. 1985. The Urban Design Process. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Tzoulas, Konstantinos, and Philip James. 2010. “Peoples’ Use of, and Concerns about, Green Space Networks: A Case Study of Birchwood, Warrington New Town, UK.†Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Special section on “Forest recreation and nature tourism,†9 (2): 121–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.12.001.
Vikas, Mehta. 2014. “Evaluating Public Space.†Journal of Urban Design Vol 19, No. 1: 53–58.
Villanueva, Karen, Hannah Badland, Paula Hooper, Mohammad Javad Koohsari, Suzanne Mavoa, Melanie Davern, Rebecca Roberts, Sharon Goldfeld, and Billie Giles-Corti. 2015. “Developing Indicators of Public Open Space to Promote Health and Wellbeing in Communities.†Applied Geography 57 (February): 112–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.003.
Zhang, Wenjuan, Jun Yang, Lvyi Ma, and Conghong Huang. 2015. “Factors Affecting the Use of Urban Green Spaces for Physical Activities: Views of Young Urban Residents in Beijing.†Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 14 (4): 851–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.08.006.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
